The AI Visibility Audit Kit is the white-label methodology for delivering that audit: a client-ready report template, an 8-tab scoring workbook, the exact prompts, and a proposal template with verified 2026 pricing benchmarks. £39, one-off, unlimited client use.
No visibility outcomes are guaranteed, AI engine results are volatile; this is an evidence-based diagnostic methodology.
The verified 2026 market rate for a one-off AI visibility audit is $500 to $2,000 (LLM Pulse, GEO Agency Guide). Agency deep-dives run to $5,000 and beyond (LovedBy.ai, 2026), and enterprise GEO audits reach $8,000 to $25,000 (HumansWith.ai, 2026). Every figure was verified live on 25 August 2026, and the full claim-to-URL source table ships inside the kit so your clients can check your numbers.
| Service shape | Verified 2026 market band | Source |
|---|---|---|
| One-off AI visibility audit | $500 to $2,000 | LLM Pulse, GEO Agency Guide |
| Agency deep-dive audit | $2,500 to $5,000 and up | LovedBy.ai, 2026 |
| Enterprise standalone GEO audit | $8,000 to $25,000 | HumansWith.ai, 2026 |
| GEO add-on to an existing SEO retainer | 20 to 30% uplift on existing monthly fees | Frase, agency playbook, 2026 |
These are published market observations, not promises of what you will earn. The kit's proposal template includes the full pricing section so you set your own rates from evidence, not guesswork.
"Guaranteed ChatGPT citations." "Rank number one in AI Overviews." Nobody can honestly promise that. An independent study of 530,875 AI citations found that most cited sources change day to day, with daily churn of 44 to 88% depending on the engine (GetMentions.ai, June 2026). Sellers who promise placements are guessing, and clients eventually notice.
This kit takes the position that survives: an evidence-based diagnostic methodology, honestly measured, with a re-test to prove movement. The volatility research is cited and disclosed to your client inside the report template, because "here is what no honest provider can promise" is precisely what separates you from the vendors selling snake oil. The kit's source table even documents one widely repeated market statistic it refused to use, because the number could not be traced to a primary dataset.
Markdown plus styled HTML that opens straight into Word or Google Docs. Live visibility tests, an eight-dimension diagnostic, a transparent AI Visibility Score, copy-paste fixes, a developer task sheet, and a prioritised 90-day plan. Practitioner guidance sits in clearly marked notes with a print-safe system that keeps them out of the client PDF.
Excel, no macros. A 40-check runsheet across eight dimensions, a scoring tab with enforced dropdowns and a disclosed weighting model (every weight in visible cells), a 3 by 3 live-test grid for real queries on real engines, a Citation Sources worksheet that logs which domains the AI engines actually cite on your client's queries, a findings log, and a client tracker with automatic 90-day re-audit dates. The re-audit is your recurring revenue.
The exact prompts for every audit dimension, live-test query construction rules, report-drafting prompts, and re-audit prompts, with honesty rules built in: one run per engine, date-stamp everything, screenshot everything.
A client-facing proposal skeleton plus a pricing section for you, with the verified 2026 market benchmarks for one-off audits, monitoring retainers, GEO add-ons and enterprise tiers.
First practice audit this week, first pitch script included. Honestly stated: the eight-dimension pass takes 30 to 45 minutes on your first run, and assembling the client report takes another 60 to 90.
Every market claim, the URL it was verified against, and the verification date. Ships in the bundle, so your clients can check your numbers.
The methodology runs on any capable AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, whatever you already use) plus free tools only: Google's Rich Results Test and PageSpeed Insights. No rank trackers, no monitoring SaaS, no monthly fees stacked on top of your £39.
No visibility outcomes are guaranteed, AI engine results are volatile; this is an evidence-based diagnostic methodology.
The proposal template gives you the client-facing skeleton and the verified 2026 benchmarks to price against. The pitch itself is one evidenced sentence from a 10-minute teaser: run one customer-style query on one engine, and show the prospect who got recommended instead of them.
Work down the 40-check runsheet; each row points at the exact prompt in the prompt pack that runs it, on whichever AI assistant you already use, plus two free tools (Google's Rich Results Test and PageSpeed Insights). The live tests take about 20 minutes, and the eight-dimension pass takes 30 to 45 minutes once you have a practice audit behind you.
The white-label report template becomes their branded deliverable: your logo, your name on the work. Live-test tables, the transparent score, copy-paste fixes, a developer task sheet, and the Citation Sources action list, every domain the engines cite that your client is absent from, turned into named actions.
The workbook's client tracker sets a 90-day re-audit date automatically for every client. Same queries, same weights, movement you can point at. The re-audit is the recurring revenue, and the tracker holds as many clients as you take on.
No visibility outcomes are guaranteed, AI engine results are volatile; this is an evidence-based diagnostic methodology.
An audit ends with a fix list, and some clients will ask who applies it. For owner-operators who want to ship the fixes themselves, this site sells a separate client-facing product you can point them at: the $25 Interactive Toolkit, a guided 18-step implementation walkthrough that generates the prompts and schema blocks with the business's own details filled in, with save and resume.
Honest framing: it is a separate purchase your client makes directly, not part of the kit, and pointing a client at it is optional. It exists so "who does the work?" has an answer that is not a retainer you did not want to sell.
SEO freelancers adding a GEO or AEO audit offer. Agencies productising an audit as the front door to retainer work (the verified benchmark: agencies adding GEO to existing SEO retainers report a 20 to 30% uplift on existing monthly fees, Frase, 2026). Web designers and marketers whose clients keep asking why ChatGPT does not mention them.
Unlimited white-label client use is licensed with the kit. It works for any market your clients are in, because the methodology is engine-based, not country-based.
Run audits for your own business rather than for clients? The free diagnosis and the self-serve $10 workbook are the owner-operator path.
You need to be comfortable reading a web page critically and running prompts. Every check in the runsheet points at the exact prompt that runs it, and the report template's practitioner notes explain what each finding means before you delete them from the client copy.
Any capable assistant for the analysis prompts, and the live tests run on the engines your client's customers actually use (Perplexity, Google AI Mode, ChatGPT). Engine names are used factually, no affiliation, and the methodology does not depend on any one vendor.
The kit is the methodology, not the service. Clients pay for a practitioner-run diagnostic, evidenced live tests, a transparent score, and a prioritised plan. The verified market band for exactly that shape of work is $500 to $2,000, sources in the download. The quick-start includes the honest advice not to undercut below roughly £400, because that price signals an automated scan.
The workbook is standard Excel with no macros; formula cells are protected (no password) so a stray keystroke cannot break the scoring. The report template ships as Markdown and styled HTML that opens directly in Word or Google Docs.
If a file does not open or work as described, email [email protected] and it will be fixed or refunded.
Built with AI assistance and human-directed research; every market claim is cited and the source table ships in your download.
No visibility outcomes are guaranteed, AI engine results are volatile; this is an evidence-based diagnostic methodology. Market pricing figures are published observations (verified 25 August 2026, sources included), not promises of what you will earn.